1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 517 P.2d
  5. 517 P.2d 660 (1974)
 

WASHTOK v. BAYLESS

517 P.2d 660 (1974)

John B. WASHTOK and Donald B. Washtok, Appellants, v. James W. BAYLESS and Jean C. Bayless, Husband and Wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis E. Harrington, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Brink & Moore, Hillsboro.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe and A. Allan Franzke, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, HOLMAN, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of deceit to recover damages for an alleged misrepresentation by defendants as to the condition of an apartment complex which they sold to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict for defendants.

Plaintiffs bought the property in 1968. In 1969 they discovered that the pipes in the entire water distribution system were pitted and corroded as a result of electrolysis. The complaint alleges that the sellers knew of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases