1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 473 F.2d
  5. 473 F.2d 365 (1973)
 

LANDRY v. HEMPHILL, NOYES & CO.

Nos. 71-1178, 71-1179.

473 F.2d 365 (1973)

Norman A. LANDRY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HEMPHILL, NOYES & CO., et al., Defendants, Appellees. Norman A. LANDRY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. HEMPHILL, NOYES & CO., Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided February 7, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman A. Landry, pro se.

James C. Heigham, Boston, Mass., with whom Jeffrey L. Heidt, and Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Hemphill, Noyes & Co. et al.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE and CAMPBELL, Circuit Judges.

McENTEE, Circuit Judge.

Among a plethora of other issues, this appeal presents us with a novel question concerning the limitations to be placed upon an implied private action for the violation of Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board, promulgated pursuant to § 7 of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78g. That question is: May a customer recover from a broker-dealer his entire market loss on a transaction which has been partially financed on credit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases