Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 September 11, 1973.
PER CURIAM.
The defense to this action was based upon a claim of material alteration. Defendant Paul Otto testified that the agreed amount of the mortgage debt was lower, the term of the mortgage longer, and the monthly instalments less than the corresponding terms in the note and mortgage sued on. Otto claimed that he and his wife were tricked into signing blank forms and that unauthorized amounts were...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.