1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 61 Wis.2d
  5. 61 Wis.2d 585 (1973)
 

JOHNSON v. HEINTZ

No. 219.

61 Wis.2d 585 (1973)

213 N.W.2d 85

JOHNSON and husband, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HEINTZ and another, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs and Appellants: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 21, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs, and a response brief to the separate appeal of the third-party respondent, by Wickhem, Consigny, Sedor, Andrews & Hemming, S. C., of Janesville, and oral argument by Richard E. Hemming.

For the respondents there was a brief by Grimm & Elliott and Robert J. Elliott, all of Janesville, and oral argument by Robert J. Elliott.

For the third-party respondent there was a brief by Noll, Donovan, Bolgrien & Ruth of Beloit, and oral argument by William F. Donovan.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The appellants, Gladys Heintz and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, contend that the trial court erred when it instructed the jury that, on the basis of the evidence, it could determine whether the injury occasioned by Emaline Johnson on August 12, 1969, when she fell while hanging out the clothes, was the natural result of the injury sustained in the automobile accident and permitted an award of additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases