1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 60 Wis.2d
  5. 60 Wis.2d 427 (1973)
 

ROUX LABORATORIES v. BEAUTY FRANCHISES

No. 281.

60 Wis.2d 427 (1973)

210 N.W.2d 441

ROUX LABORATORIES, INC., Respondent, v. BEAUTY FRANCHISES, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 2, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Hersh & Stupar, S. C., of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Lorinczi & Weiss, attorneys, and George G. Lorinczi, Robert K. Steuer and Robert P. Goldstein of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

A brief amicus curiae was filed by Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Harold J. Lessner, assistant attorney general.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 September 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

The answer and counterclaim alleges that the plaintiff gave advertising rebates to competitors of the defendant in the state of Wisconsin, but did not give rebates to the defendant. This is alleged to be a violation of secs. 133.17, 133.185, and 133.01, Stats. It is further alleged that the plaintiff's conduct renders the contract for purchase of goods between the plaintiff and defendant illegal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases