1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 366 F.Supp.
  5. 366 F.Supp. 99 (1973)
 

LUGO v. EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND OF ILLUM. PROD. INDUS.

No. 73-C-663.

366 F.Supp. 99 (1973)

Juan Sanchez LUGO, Plaintiff, v. The EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND OF the ILLUMINATION PRODUCTS INDUSTRY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

October 12, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Gray, Jr., New York City, for plaintiff; Douglas J. Kramer, Brooklyn Legal Services Corp., Brooklyn, N. Y., and David S. Preminger, New York City, of counsel; E. Judson Jennings and Jonathan A. Weiss, Legal Services for the Elderly Poor, New York City, of counsel.

Harold Stern, New York City, for defendants; Norman Rothfeld, New York City, of counsel.

BARTELS, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against The Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry (Retirement Fund) and the trustees thereof, alleging a violation by defendants of Section 302 of the Taft-Hartley Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 186 (the Act) in denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Retirement Fund, and also claiming damages. Jurisdiction is alleged under Section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases