ZIMMERMAN REALTY v. VILLAGE OF ROSEVILLE

No. 44123.

210 N.W.2d 53 (1973)

ZIMMERMAN REALTY, etc., Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF ROSEVILLE, Respondent, County of Ramsey, Respondent, State of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Glen J. Johnson, et al., Intervenors, Appellants, Rice Creek Watershed District, Intervenor, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 27, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hyman Edelman, Minneapolis, for appellants.

John E. Daubney, St. Paul, for Zimmerman Realty.

Robert C. Bell, St. Paul, for Roseville.

William Randall, County Atty., Thomas M. Quayle, Asst. County Atty., St. Paul, for County of Ramsey.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., for State, and others.

Frank J. Murray, St. Paul, for Rice Creek Watershed Dist.

Heard before OTIS, PETERSON, TODD, and GILLESPIE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Applicants appeal from an order denying their motion for intervention as of right under Rule 24.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, and for permissive intervention under Rule 24.02, Rules of Civil Procedure. The question presented for determination is whether applicants may intervene, either permissively or as of right, in the suit at bar. The trial court concluded that the issue presented in the suit was separate and apart from any claim made or issue raised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases