PAUL W. BROWN, J.
At the outset, it must be observed that the majority of the Court of Appeals was anatomically in error in concluding that the flag was "over the anus"; and that the conclusion in the concurring opinion, that the young man sat on the flag, does not seem to be material to a charge of having a flag sewn on his pants pocket.
R. C. 2921.05 cannot be said to specifically prohibit the use of the flag as an article of clothing, as an attachment or...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
