1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 49 Mich.
  5. 49 Mich. App. 162 (1973)
 

SPONICK v. DETROIT POLICE DEPT.

Docket Nos. 15396, 15397, 15398.

49 Mich. App. 162 (1973)

211 N.W.2d 674

SPONICK v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT RICKARD v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT DAUGHERTY v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 29, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armand D. Bove, for plaintiff Sponick.

Harrison, Friedman & Roberson, for plaintiffs Rickard and Daugherty.

Michael M. Glusac, Corporation Counsel, and John E. Cross and Maureen P. Reilly, Assistants Corporation Counsel, for defendants.

Before: BRONSON, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and VAN VALKENBURG, JJ.

R.B. BURNS, J.

Appellants, three Detroit police officers, were disciplined, after hearings before separate departmental trial boards, for various violations of the rules and regulations of the Detroit Police Department. Each officer sought review of the disciplinary action taken against him by filing in the Wayne County Circuit Court a complaint for an order of superintending control directed against appellees. In each case the circuit court refused to issue the order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases