STATE AUTO MUTUAL INS. CO. v. CHRYSLER CORP.

No. 72-918.

36 Ohio St. 2d 151 (1973)

STATE AUTO MUTUAL INS. CO., APPELLANT, ET AL., v. CHRYSLER CORP. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 19, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Droder Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Albert T. Brown, Jr., for appellant.

Bloom & Greene Co., L. P. A., Mr. J. William Duning, Messrs. Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis and Mr. W. Roger Fry, for appellees.


CORRIGAN, J.

Appellant propounds four propositions of law. The first three propositions deal with the degree of proof necessary to bring products liability actions within the purview of the jury for a determination as to the extent of the manufacturer's and dealer's liability under their warranty obligations and the proof necessary to establish liability for negligent repair. Appellant's fourth proposition relates to the trial court's discretion in imposing sanctions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases