1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 36 Ohio
  5. 36 Ohio St. 2d 94 (1973)
 

CITY OF COLUMBUS v. MOLT

No. 73-322.

36 Ohio St. 2d 94 (1973)

CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. MOLT, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 28, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James J. Hughes, Jr., city attorney, Mr. Daniel W. Johnson and Miss Phyllis F. KunJder, for appellee.

Mr. Duane F. Lantz, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Appellant argues that R. C. 4511.99(F) is a general law, as contemplated by Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution, with which municipal police legislation (Section 2133.99, Columbus City Code) must not conflict, and that the Columbus penalty ordinance must fall because it is substantially in conflict with R. C. 4511.99(F).

It is further argued by appellant that R. C. 4511.06, which provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases