1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 368 F.Supp.
  5. 368 F.Supp. 829 (1973)
 

VAN HOOMISSEN v. XEROX CORPORATION

No. C-73-0423 OJC.

368 F.Supp. 829 (1973)

Dave VAN HOOMISSEN, Plaintiff, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. XEROX CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

December 19, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thorne, Clopton, Herz, Stanek, San Jose, Cal., Howard C. Anawalt, Santa Clara, Cal., for plaintiff.

Chris Roggerson, Chester F. Relyea, June Wooliver Stahl, Carlos G. Ynostroza, San Francisco, Cal., for EEOC.

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Richard Haas, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OLIVER J. CARTER, Chief Judge.

Defendant Xerox and the nine individual defendants in this case have moved the Court to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and to strike each of its counts.

Plaintiff Van Hoomissen is suing defendants for various alleged acts of retaliation, to wit: denial of job advancement opportunities with the accompanying salary increases, demotion, and finally, termination of employment. The alleged retaliation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases