PER CURIAM.
On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for directed verdict on the issue of liability.
The driver of a vehicle which strikes the rear of another vehicle is presumed to be negligent and a plaintiff would be entitled to recover in absence of an explanation by the defendant. Gulle v. Boggs, Fla. 1965,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
