STATE EX REL. SCHLEHLEIN v. DURIS

No. 204.

54 Wis.2d 34 (1972)

194 N.W.2d 613

STATE EX REL. SCHLEHLEIN, Respondent, v. DURIS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 29, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Charlton, Yanisch, Greco & Roffa, attorneys, and Earl A. Charlton and Carlton Roffa of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Carlton Roffa.

For the respondent the cause was argued by James W. Conway, assistant corporation counsel of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Robert P. Russell, corporation counsel.


BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant-appellant, Duris, has raised three questions on this appeal:

(1) Was it error to refuse to admit testimony as to the resemblance between the child and a man not a party to the action?

(2) Was it error to refuse to hear an offer of proof on the resemblance issue?

(3) Was the evidence sufficient to sustain a finding that defendant was the father of the child?

The complainant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases