1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 352 F.Supp.
  5. 352 F.Supp. 505 (1972)
 

OHIO RIVER COMPANY v. CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY

Nos. 69 C 1420, 69 C 2294.

352 F.Supp. 505 (1972)

The OHIO RIVER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, Defendant, Third Party Plaintiff, v. OIL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., American Commercial Barge Lines, Inc., the M/V CHICAGO TRADER and the M/V BAYOU LA REINE, Third Party Defendants. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., Cross-Plaintiff Cross-Defendant, v. OIL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., Cross-Defendant Cross-Plaintiff. CONTINENTAL NAVIGATION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. OIL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC. owner of the M/V Chicago Trader, Cross-Plaintiff, v. OIL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., owner of the M/V Bayou La Reine, Cross-Defendant. OIL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., Cross-Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., Cross-Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois.

December 19, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Johnson, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., for Continental Navigation Co., plaintiff.

Heineke, Schrader, Marsch & Cuncannan, Chicago, Ill., for Oil Transport Co., Inc., defendant, cross-defendant and cross-plaintiff.

Michael A. Snyder, Bradley, Eaton, Jackman & McGovern, Chicago, Ill., for American Commercial Barge Lines, Inc., defendant, cross-plaintiff, and cross-defendant.

McCreary, Ray & Robinson, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff The Ohio River Co.

Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., for Continental Grain Co., defendant and third party plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECREE

EDWIN A. ROBSON, Chief Judge.

The Ohio River Company (Ohio River) and the Continental Navigation Company seek to recover in these suits in admiralty damages to their barges, OR-55 and CNC-195B, respectively. Oil Transport Company, Inc. (Oil Transport) and its towboat, the M/V Bayou La Reine, and American Commercial Barge Lines, Inc. and its towboat, the M/V Chicago Trader, were impleaded as third-party defendants in 69 C 2294...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases