BODEN v. TRANSIT CASUALTY CO.

No. 133.

53 Wis.2d 803 (1972)

193 N.W.2d 839

BODEN, Respondent, v. TRANSIT CASUALTY COMPANY and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 3, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Gerald T. Hayes.

For the respondent there was a brief by Warshafsky, Rotter & Tarnoff, attorneys, and Ted M. Warshafsky and Michael I. Tarnoff of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Michael I. Tarnoff.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

By motion after verdict, the defendants claimed error in the trial court ruling that had prevented them from showing the interest of plaintiff's employer in the outcome of the case. The trial court conceded the error, set aside the jury verdict as to damages and ordered a new trial on the damage issues only.

The court-conceded error came in regard to the testimony of one of plaintiff's witnesses, Donald Schaeffer, a supervisory employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases