1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 53 Wis.2d
  5. 53 Wis.2d 791 (1972)
 

BEDNARSKI v. STATE

No. State 144.

53 Wis.2d 791 (1972)

193 N.W.2d 668

BEDNARSKI, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 1, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Franklyn M. Gimbel of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Richard J. Boyd, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant raises two issues:

1. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction for endangering safety by conduct regardless of life?

2. Does the interest of justice demand a new trial?

Sec. 941.30, Stats., provides:

"Endangering safety by conduct regardless of life. Whoever endangers another's safety by conduct imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases