1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 468 F.2d
  5. 468 F.2d 234 (1972)
 

IN THE MATTER OF CHALMAS

No. 71-2997.

468 F.2d 234 (1972)

In the Matter of James N. Chalmas, also known as Ted Sharliss, Witness before Special Grand Jury. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James N. CHALMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 10, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Osterhoudt (argued), of Singer, Marquette & Osterhoudt, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Jack O'Donnel, Atty., Dept. of Justice (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Chalmas was called before a special United States grand jury to testify regarding possible violations of federal gambling laws (18 U.S.C. § 1955). He refused to testify on Fifth Amendment grounds. After being granted transactional immunity (18 U.S.C. § 2514), Chalmas was again called before the grand jury, and after answering a number of questions refused to testify further, claiming that the questions were

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases