WARE v. RICHARDSON

No. 71-809 Civ.

347 F.Supp. 344 (1972)

Erwin WARE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Elliot RICHARDSON, as head of the Federal Housing Urban Development Programs (HUD), et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma, Civil Division.

May 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erwin Ware, Berlye B. Haag, and Bradford Haag, pro se, Tribal Indian Land Rights Assn., Moore, Okl., for plaintiffs.

Lynn J. Bullis, Jr., V. P. Crowe, Andrew M. Coats, Crowe, Dunlevy, Thweatt, Swinford, Johnson & Burdick, Oklahoma City, Okl., Chuck Goodwin, Anadarko, Okl., William R. Burkett and Floy E. Dawson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action complaining, principally, that houses provided by the Kiowa Housing Authority are substandard and not worth the money being paid for them (presumably public money). Various of the Defendants have moved for dismissal on the ground that federal jurisdiction does not exist. This Opinion and Order is therefore confined to the sole issue of federal jurisdiction.

The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases