Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Memorandum:
The award was within the estimates of the opposing expert witnesses. The State's sole objection is that the amount found for consequential damages exceeds the amount of such damage stated by either expert. The court made its determination fully aware of this fact. It stated that in its view the reason for the claimants' expert's low assessment of consequential damage was the fact that he placed too high...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
