The State contends that the trial court incorrectly found that the subject property, a shopping center, had a shorter economic life and that managerial expenses increased because of a taking of a portion of the parking area in front of the stores. The issues are entirely related to the weight of the evidence and credibility of the witnesses. There is evidence in the record to support the findings of the trial court.
Judgment affirmed,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
