1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 269 So.2d
  5. 269 So.2d 353 (1972)
 

MUZIKA v. BUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 41707.

269 So.2d 353 (1972)

Harry MUZIKA, Petitioner, v. BUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/a Fairvilla Bowling Lanes, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied December 15, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard J. Zimmerman, of Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for petitioner.

Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, and Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondents.

DEKLE, Justice.

This is a "competent substantial evidence" question arising in a workmen's compensation claim wherein two Industrial Claims Commissioners have improperly substituted their judgment for that of the Judge of Industrial Claims who heard the factual disputes and reached his conclusions.1 He is amply supported by competent substantial evidence. We reverse the reversal by the Commission and reinstate the judgment of the Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases