1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 54 Wis.2d
  5. 54 Wis.2d 401 (1972)
 

KASTENSON v. KASTENSON

No. 10.

54 Wis.2d 401 (1972)

195 N.W.2d 454

KASTENSON, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, v. KASTENSON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Schoone, McManus & Hanson of Racine, and oral argument by Adrian P. Schoone.

For the respondents there was a brief by Brown, Black & Riegelman, and oral argument by Richard J. Kreul, all of Racine.

HANLEY, J.

The respondents are proceeding against appellant under the doctrine of attractive nuisance. The elements of a cause of action under this doctrine were explained in Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc. (1965), 27 Wis.2d 390, 393, 134 N.W.2d 453, as follows:

"The attractive-nuisance doctrine is grounded in negligence. It was applied in Angelier v. Red Star Yeast & Products Co. [(1934), 215 Wis. 47...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases