1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 8 Cal.3d
  5. 8 Cal.3d 440 (1972)
 

HULLAND v. STATE BAR

Docket No. L.A. 29787.

8 Cal.3d 440 (1972)

503 P.2d 608

105 Cal. Rptr. 152

FRANKLIN ALFRED HULLAND, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Monta W. Shirley for Petitioner.

F. LaMar Forshee, Ronald W. Stovitz and Christopher M. Reuss for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding under Business and Professions Code section 6083, subdivision (b) and rule 59(b) of the California Rules of Court to review a decision of the State Bar Disciplinary Board.

Local Administrative Committee Number 6 for Los Angeles County found that petitioner, Franklin Alfred Hulland, in violation of his oath and duties as an attorney,1 wilfully neglected to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases