1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 54 Wis.2d
  5. 54 Wis.2d 329 (1972)
 

BEBERFALL v. BEBERFALL

No. 58.

54 Wis.2d 329 (1972)

195 N.W.2d 625

BEBERFALL, Appellant, v. BEBERFALL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Sieker, Reynolds & Peckham of Madison, and oral argument by Verlin H. Peckham.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hughes & Harrand of Oshkosh, and oral argument by Thomas E. Hughes.

WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised by this appeal:

1. Were the insurance provisions in the divorce judgment related to the property settlement or to child support?

2. If the insurance provisions are related to child support did the county court abuse its discretion in modifying those requirements?

In oral argument counsel for appellant asserted that the insurance provisions in the divorce judgment are part of the property settlement rather than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases