1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 53 Wis.2d
  5. 53 Wis.2d 306 (1972)
 

HUBBARD v. MATHIS

No. 132.

53 Wis.2d 306 (1972)

193 N.W.2d 15

HUBBARD, Appellant, v. MATHIS and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 4, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Eisenberg, Kletzke & Eisenberg and oral argument by Jerome F. Pogodzinski, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Borgelt, Powell, Peterson & Frauen, attorneys, and Donald R. Peterson of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Donald R. Peterson.

HALLOWS, C. J.

We have said many times that to raise a question on appeal as a matter of right, it must be properly preserved. Improper remarks in closing arguments cannot be a basis for a motion for a new trial or a basis for an appeal to this court if no timely objection to the argument was made. Basile v. Fath (1925), 185 Wis. 646, 649, 650, 201 N. W. 247, 202 N. W. 367; Zimmerman v. Dornbrook (1959), 6 Wis.2d 567

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases