1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 264 So.2d
  5. 264 So.2d 85 (1972)
 

VAN ARSDALE v. DiMIL LAND COMPANY

No. 71-975.

264 So.2d 85 (1972)

Dorothy L. VAN ARSDALE, Formerly Dorothy L. Groover, Appellant, v. DiMIL LAND COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony A. Balasso, of the Law Offices of William G. Miller, Jr., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

J. Patrick Dyal, of Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Each side moved for summary judgment and, at least tacitly, agreed that the case was a ripe and proper one for adjudication and disposition under Rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A.1

Summary judgment was duly entered for plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of a land trade agreement. We reverse and remand because there are material disputed issues and critical unplumbed areas. Holl v. Talcott...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases