1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 80 Wn.2d
  5. 80 Wn.2d 254 (1972)
 

LANSINGER v. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DIST.

No. 41965.

80 Wn.2d 254 (1972)

493 P.2d 1008

JOHN M. LANSINGER, JR., et al., Appellants, v. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 6368, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 10, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee, Carney, Smart & Bever, by Milton C. Smith, for appellants.

A.L. Newbould, G. Grant Wilcox, and Donald H. Stout, for respondent.

HALE, J.

Appellants contend that they should not be required to pay a $1,203.50 local improvement district assessment for a sanitary sewer constructed adjacent to the rear of their property because it does not benefit their property. Defendant City of Seattle asserts that the plaintiffs failed to make a timely appeal from the ordinance confirming the assessment and that under the statutes this ended the matter. The case is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases