APPELLATE DIVISIOIN, FIRST DEPARTMENT v. ERDMANN


39 A.D.2d 223 (1972)

In the Matter of The Justices of the Appellate Division, First Department, Petitioners, v. Martin Erdmann, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 27, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Shientag for petitioners.

Ellis, Stringfellow, Patton & Leibovitz (William Leibovitz of counsel), for respondent.

Association of the Bar of the City of New York, amicus curiae.

HERLIHY, P. J., STALEY, JR., and REYNOLDS, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; GREENBLOTT and SIMONS, JJ., dissent and vote to dismiss in an opinion by GREENBLOTT, J.


Per Curiam.

In this proceeding to discipline an attorney, which proceeding was instituted in the Appellate Division, First Department, and subsequently transferred to this court, petitioners move for an order sustaining the petition and charges to the extent of finding respondent guilty of professional misconduct. Respondent cross-moves for orders 1) dismissing the petition and charges as being inadequate as a matter of law to sustain the alleged violations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases