APPLICATION OF DOEBEL

Patent Appeal No. 8727.

461 F.2d 823 (1972)

Application of Karl J. DOEBEL et al.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied September 7, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl F. Jorda, Ardsley, N. Y., Bruce M. Collins, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellants.

S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jack E. Armore, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and CLARK, Justice (Ret.), United States Supreme Court, sitting by designation.


ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, insofar as it affirmed the rejection of claim 2 in appellants' application entitled "N-Substituted Phenothiazines."1 At oral argument, counsel for appellants withdrew the appeal as to claims 1 and 3. No claims have been allowed.

The invention relates to phenothiazine derivatives, which are useful as tranquilizers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases