SCHOTT v. CITY OF KINGMAN

No. 26862.

461 F.2d 593 (1972)

Anna Mae SCHOTT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF KINGMAN, an incorporated Arizona municipality, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold E. Whitney (argued), of Minne & Sorenson, Phoenix, Ariz., O. E. Everett, City Atty., Kingman, Ariz., for defendants-appellants.

Robert John Walton (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WEICK, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.


MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

The question presented in this diversity case is whether, under Arizona law, a subdivider of property adjacent to a city who installs a water system in satisfaction of a state-imposed condition to the right to sell subdivision lots, which system is then connected to the city system, can thereafter recover from the city the cost of such installation. The district Court held that she could. Its findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases