LA LIMA v. FATH


36 A.D.2d 923 (1971)

Patrick La Lima, an Infant, by Patsy La Lima His Father and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Fath et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 11, 1971


In affirming, we do not countenance some facets of the trial, nor some of the rulings and dispositions of the Trial Judge. Inter alia: The failure to call one of the examining doctors by the defendant did not warrant the charge, based on request of plaintiffs' counsel, as given by the court. This physician, retained by the defendant only for examining purposes, bore no special nor personal relationship to the plaintiff, Patrick...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases