The appellant has alleged that after pleading guilty to a reduced charge and being sentenced in December of 1964 he conferred with his then assigned counsel as to an appeal and was advised that an appeal would be costly. He alleges that "being destitute, petitioner failed to take an action on an appeal", and that his assigned counsel "failed to advise him that he could take an appeal as a pauper." From the foregoing allegations it would appear that the appellant had satisfactorily...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
