HALL, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for burglary. All his enumerations of error concern the charge of the court.
The court charged in substance the statutory definition of burglary, including all the necessary elements, and gave a satisfactory explanation of "reasonable doubt." The court did not err in refusing to give defendant's requested charges in these areas.
Neither did the court err in failing to charge that defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.