BANK v. TOMASZCZYK

No. 69-780.

27 Ohio St. 2d 55 (1971)

THE WINDHAM BANK, APPELLEE, v. TOMASZCZYK, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Ford & Kainrad and Mr. Joseph R. Kainrad, for appellant.

Mr. Leo M. Ascherman and Mr. Robert W. Wurzman, for appellant.


O'NEILL, C. J.

Appellant sets forth six propositions of law. Three relate to his claim that the trial court, in proceedings in indirect contempt, must follow the procedures outlined in R. C. 2705.03 and that under that section an alleged contemnor is entitled to have the charges against him put in writing and journalized. The other three are that to support a finding of indirect contempt it must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that there was an intent to commit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases