He contends on this appeal that a search of his premises violated his constitutional rights and, therefore, was illegal. At the suppression hearing it developed that the Schenectady police had received information that appellant was in possession of the fruits of recent burglaries. After the police ascertained that he was on parole, they contacted the New York State Division of Parole. Subsequently, a Parole Officer accompanied two Schenectady policemen to appellant's residence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
