We find no merit in appellant's contention that the testimony of an accomplice was not sufficiently corroborated, and that because there were inconsistencies in the testimony, particularly that of the accomplice, the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The major testimony in the case did come from an accomplice, but there is clearly sufficient corroboration of that testimony in the instant record (People v. Morhouse,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. O'DELL
36 A.D.2d 774 (1971)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Charles O'Dell, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 3, 1971
March 3, 1971
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
