HENRY v. DEPARTMENT OF H. & U. D. (HUD), WASH., D.C.

No. 71-1410.

451 F.2d 355 (1971)

Evan J. HENRY, Representing Himself and All Other Taxpayers Similarly affected, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD), WASHINGTON, D. C., et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

November 23, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan J. Henry, pro se.

C. Stanley McMahon, Winona, Minn., for appellees Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Winona and W. O. Finkelnburg.

George M. Robertson, Jr., Winona, Minn., for appellees City of Winona and Norman E. Indall.

Robert G. Renner, U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees Department of Housing and Urban Development and George C. Romney.

Before GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and VAN PELT, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

The decision of the United States District Court dismissing the appellant's complaint on its merits and with prejudice is affirmed for the reason that the complaint does not state a cause of action.

The appellant requests on appeal that this Court give him permission to amend his complaint. He requests, further, that we give an opinion on the following questions: (1) the constitutionality of Minnesota Statute 462.585 Subd. 4; (2) the validity of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases