UNITED STATES v. NADEAU

No. 26007.

442 F.2d 362 (1971)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Daniel NADEAU, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 11, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Thorne, of Thorne, Stanton, Clopton, Herz & Stanek, San Jose, Cal., for appellant.

James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Chief, Crim. Div., James L. Hazard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant's contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. ___, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases