Order affirmed.
The ground upon which appellant brought the proceeding is that he was not informed of his right to appeal as a poor person from the judgment of conviction in question. After the hearing, the Criminal Term found, inter alia, that appellant in fact had been advised of his right to appeal at the time of his conviction in 1946 and that the credible evidence did not support his claim of indigency at that time. We agree that appellant failed to sustain...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.