1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 52 Wis.2d
  5. 52 Wis.2d 703 (1971)
 

HARRIS v. STATE

No. State 22.

52 Wis.2d 703 (1971)

191 N.W.2d 198

HARRIS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 2, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Salvatore C. Quarino of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

HALLOWS, C. J.

The central issue on this appeal is whether a voluntary statement made by Detective Joseph Cherney, in testifying for the state, was so prejudicial as to require a new trial. During direct examination Detective Cherney testified that during part of the day on which the burglary occurred he had kept Harris under surveillance. In describing the arrival of Harris and others at Harris' apartment, the detective stated, "They [Harris and one Norman Pozorski...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases