Plaintiff's predecessor maintained a checking account with defendant bank which required two signatures on checks drawn on that account. Its comptroller, over a period of several years, signed those checks, as he was authorized to do, and forged the signature of another officer. Plaintiff, claiming that it did not discover the forgeries until September, 1967, has asserted two causes of action, the first of which seeks to recover the proceeds of checks drawn between February...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
