PETRU v. HERTZ CORP.


36 A.D.2d 704 (1971)

Maria Petru et al., Respondents, v. Hertz Corp. et al., Defendants, and Peter Cawley, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 11, 1971


Plaintiffs-respondents shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

The dissent fairly states the facts, and no addition thereto is necessary except to point out that the circumstance that defendant-appellant's car was stopped in the roadway was not occasioned by "the directions of any police officer" (the only pertinent possibly exculpatory provision in the applicable Traffic Regulations [§§ 80, 81, subd. 5]). Defendant stopped...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases