BURREY v. EMBARCADERO MUN. IMPROVEMENT DIST.

Docket No. L.A. 29837.

5 Cal.3d 671 (1971)

488 P.2d 395

97 Cal. Rptr. 203

DAVID C. BURREY et al., Petitioners, v. EMBARCADERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT et al., Respondents; WALLOVER, INC., Intervener.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

September 13, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James R. Christiansen for Petitioners.

Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch and Robert G. Auwbrey for Respondents.

Hill, Farrer & Burrill, William S. Scully, Jr., Joel H. Jubelier and Marvin E. Garrett for Intervener.


OPINION

PETERS, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, petitioners, residents of the Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District (EMID), challenge the voting provisions governing election of the board of directors of the district on the ground that these provisions violate the one person, one vote rule required by the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We conclude, for reasons discussed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases