1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 22 Cal.App.3d
  5. 22 Cal.App.3d 626 (1971)
 

KACHIG v. BOOTHE

Docket No. 11502.

22 Cal.App.3d 626 (1971)

99 Cal. Rptr. 393

WILLIAM M. KACHIG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LAURENCE BOOTHE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District Division Two.

December 31, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hurwitz & Hurwitz and Daniel L. Stack for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Garrett & Dimino, Kenneth R. Garrett, R. Michael Hanley, and Robert H. Green for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KAUFMAN, J.

At the commencement of trial, defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings were granted and judgment for defendants was entered. Plaintiffs (the Kachigs) appeal.

FACTS

(1, 2) When a motion for judgment on the pleadings has the purpose and effect of a general demurrer, the facts alleged in the pleading attacked must be accepted as...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases