1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 36 A.D.2d
  5. 36 A.D.2d 587 (1971)
 

ROSEMAN v. WEISMAN

36 A.D.2d 587 (1971)

Arnold D. Roseman, Appellant, v. Milton C. Weisman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 18, 1971

This case clearly lends itself to a joint trial. In view of the dependency of this case upon the situation involved in the other two cases, and the overlapping nature of the facts and causes of action, this case should be part of a joint trial with the other two. The defendants-respondents have accepted this suggestion. As was so lucidly stated in Padilla v. Greyhound Lines (29 A.D.2d 495), a joint trial does not mean consolidation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases