1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 49 Wis.2d
  5. 49 Wis.2d 526 (1971)
 

WATCHMAKING EXAMINING BD. v. HUSAR

No. 12.

49 Wis.2d 526 (1971)

182 N.W.2d 257

WATCHMAKING EXAMINING BOARD (Department of Regulation and Licensing), Appellant, v. HUSAR, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 5, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by Charles A. Bleck, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by John P. Buckley of Waukesha.

A brief amicus curiae was filed by Fritschler, Pellino & Protzmann of Madison, for the Wisconsin Jeweler's Association and Wisconsin Licensed Watchmakers Association.

HEFFERNAN, J.

It is well established in this state that the police power may be properly exercised to limit certain substantial rights of citizens if, in the reasonable legislative judgment, the conduct of individuals must be controlled to protect the general welfare of the community. In the case of State ex rel. Savelanol Park Holding Corp. v. Wieland (1955), 269 Wis. 262, 267, 69 N.W.2d 217, we quoted with approval the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases