MEARS v. STATE

No. State 100.

52 Wis.2d 435 (1971)

190 N.W.2d 184

MEARS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 5, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was submitted for the plaintiff in error on the brief of Gerard O'Flaherty and Johns, Flaherty, Harman & Gillette of La Crosse, and for the defendant in error on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, William A. Platz and George L. Frederick, assistant attorneys general, and Burleigh A. Randolph, district attorney of La Crosse county.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Did the manner in which certain articles taken in the burglary—the furs, the jewelry, the TV set and typewriter, etc.—came into police possession constitute constitutionally prohibited search and seizure?1 If so, the evidence procured was improperly admitted at the trial of defendant, and reversal would be required. If not, the challenge to it fails and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases