DINDO v. WHITNEY

No. 71-1200.

451 F.2d 1 (1971)

Howard G. DINDO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Harold O. WHITNEY, Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

November 12, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gelsie J. Monti, Barre, Vt., with whom Maynard, Dunn & Phillips, Concord, N. H., was on brief, for appellant.

John E. Gormley, Lancaster, N. H., with whom Gormley & Calamari, Lancaster, N. H., was on brief, for appellee.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.


ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

Following remand of this case with our order vacating the district court's sustaining of the defense of the statute of limitations, 429 F.2d 25, the defendant pleaded, successfully, that the action was barred by reason of plaintiff's having failed to assert it as a compulsory counterclaim, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 13(a), in a prior action. This question we had raised ourselves, but declined to resolve because of...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases