HALL, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for motor vehicle theft on the ground that the circumstantial evidence upon which the conviction was based did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis except his guilt.
Briefly, the State introduced the following evidence: Defendant worked for an automobile dealer and had expressed an interest in buying an Oldsmobile on the lot. At some time on a Thursday night this auto was taken and one set...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
